How to phase a Chicago whole-home renovation you can live through.
A whole-home renovation is the largest residential project most Chicago homeowners will ever undertake. $150,000 to $400,000+. Twelve to twenty weeks of active construction. Five to seven trades working in sequence. The decision that determines whether the experience is bearable or unbearable isn't the design — it's the phasing. Here's how I sequence whole-home projects so families can stay in the house, contractors stay on schedule, and the budget doesn't slip.
What This Guide Covers
- Why Phasing Matters More Than Design
- The Three Phasing Models — And When Each Works
- Cost Breakdown by Phasing Model
- The 1654 N Oakley Case Study — A Real Phased Project
- The MEP Sequencing Problem Most Contractors Get Wrong
- Living Through Construction — What's Actually Tolerable
- The Mid-Project Vacate Decision
- What Goes Wrong With Phased Projects (And How To Prevent It)
- How to Evaluate a Contractor's Phasing Discipline
- Conclusion & Next Steps
Why phasing matters more than design.
Every whole-home renovation client I've worked with has spent months thinking about design before they hire a contractor. They've built Pinterest boards, met with kitchen designers, walked the Lincoln Park studio with samples, debated walnut versus white oak. By the time they sign with us, the design is roughly 70% decided. That's the part of the project that feels exciting, that gets photographed, that ends up on the portfolio page.
Almost nobody arrives with a phasing plan. And yet phasing is the single biggest determinant of whether the project lands on time, on budget, and with a relationship intact at the end of it.
A phased whole-home renovation isn't one project. It's three or four smaller projects sequenced so that the trades stack correctly, the family can keep some of their life functional, and the cash flow matches the work being delivered. When the phasing is wrong, electricians come back four times to do work they could have done in one visit. Cabinet deliveries arrive before the floor is leveled. The kitchen demo starts the same week as the bathroom rebuild and the family ends up living in a hotel for two weeks they didn't budget for. None of that has anything to do with bad design. It's all phasing.
What Phasing Actually Decides
When I sit down with a homeowner planning a $150,000 to $400,000 renovation, the phasing decisions we make in the first conversation determine:
- Whether they can stay in the home during construction — or need to budget for 8 to 12 weeks of alternative housing
- How many trade visits each subcontractor makes — the difference between a clean 12-week schedule and a chaotic 20-week one
- How materials are ordered and warehoused — just-in-time versus pre-staged, and which fits the project
- The cash flow rhythm — whether you're writing one 40% deposit or four staggered payments tied to milestones
- The risk profile — how much exposure you have if something goes wrong mid-project
I tell every whole-home client the same thing: design is the part you'll remember in five years. Phasing is the part you'll remember during construction. Get the phasing right and the design will land. Get the phasing wrong and the design barely matters.
— Viktor Aharon, Assembly SquadThe three phasing models — and when each works.
After 500+ projects across Chicago and the North Shore, the same three phasing patterns come up over and over. Each has a clear best-fit scenario and a clear failure mode. Choosing the wrong model is the most expensive decision you can make early in the project.
Model 1 — Sequential Rooms
The family stays in the house. Rooms are renovated one or two at a time. Kitchen first because it's the longest-lead-time scope. Then a bathroom or two. Then the next bathroom. Then the basement or the living areas. The family lives around the construction, using temporary kitchens (a microwave and an electric kettle on a folding table somewhere), one functioning bathroom at all times, and a contractor who's disciplined about dust containment.
This model works best in single-family homes with at least three bedrooms, two bathrooms, and a basement or attic that can serve as a temporary kitchen. It carries a 10 to 15 percent premium versus a full-vacate project because the same trades make more trips, the demo is contained more carefully, and the contractor's productivity drops about 20 to 25 percent compared to working in an empty house.
The failure mode is when families try this approach in a home that's too small, or with too few bathrooms, or with infants or older parents who can't tolerate the construction environment. By week four, the family is exhausted, the contractor is hearing complaints about every detail, and someone is about to suggest moving to a hotel for the duration. That conversation should have happened in week one of planning.
Model 2 — Zone-Based
The home or condo is divided into a "private zone" the family lives in and a "construction zone" the contractor controls completely. Hard wall partitions go up between them. Plastic zippered enclosures, dust barriers, even temporary doors. The family has full access to bedrooms, one bathroom, and a working kitchen. The contractor has uninterrupted access to the rest. The two worlds don't overlap.
This is the model I use most often for condo whole-home renovations where the floor plan allows clean spatial separation. A two-bedroom condo where the master suite, master bath, and a small kitchenette are on one side and the kitchen, living room, and second bathroom are on the other. The family lives in the master side. We renovate the other side completely, then they swap. The premium is smaller (5 to 8 percent) because trades work without interruption in their zone and the family doesn't fragment the schedule.
The failure mode is open-plan homes or lofts where there's no good way to wall off zones. If the living room flows into the kitchen flows into the dining area, zone-based won't work — you're forcing sequential rooms or a full vacate.
Model 3 — Full Vacate
The family moves out for the duration. Hotel, rental, family member's home, second residence. The contractor has the keys and the building is empty. This is always the fastest, cheapest, and lowest-risk way to renovate a home, because trades work uninterrupted, materials can be staged on-site, and there's no dust-containment overhead.
The cost of the alternative housing is real and has to be budgeted. A two-bedroom furnished apartment in Lincoln Park or River North runs $5,000 to $8,000 per month in 2026. For a 12-week renovation, that's $15,000 to $24,000 in housing on top of the construction. Some clients move in with family. Some have a second home. Some just absorb the cost because the time savings and stress savings are worth it.
I recommend full vacate for any project where the gut work touches more than 60% of the home's footprint, for any pre-war building (where dust and plaster work make air quality genuinely hazardous), and for any client with allergies, asthma, infants, or pets that can't tolerate the construction environment.
Cost breakdown by phasing model.
The phasing premium is real, but it's often misunderstood. Homeowners assume staying in the house is cheaper because they don't pay for alternative housing. That's only true when you ignore the construction premium and the time premium. Here's the honest math on a representative $250,000 whole-home renovation in 2026.
What the Premium Actually Buys
The 10 to 15 percent premium on sequential rooms isn't profit margin. It's covering specific costs:
- Extra trade trips. The same electrician makes 4 visits instead of 2. Each visit has a minimum 4-hour charge.
- Dust containment. Hard wall partitions, plastic enclosures, HEPA negative air machines. Real materials and real labor.
- Slower productivity. Crews work around the family's schedule, can't use the front door freely, can't make noise during nap time. Productivity drops 20–25%.
- Extended timeline. A project that takes 12 weeks vacant takes 14 to 16 weeks occupied. Every additional week is supervision cost.
- More cleanup. End-of-day cleanups are deeper because the family is going to live in the space overnight.
The 5 to 8 percent premium on zone-based work covers some of the same costs but less of them because the family is contained to one side and the contractor works without interruption on the other.
The Hidden Cost of "Phasing By Default"
The most expensive phasing decision is the one made by accident. A family decides to "just start with the kitchen" without a master schedule for the rest of the home. The kitchen finishes. They like it. They start the master bath. While the master bath is in demolition, they remember the basement needed to be reframed. Now the basement framer is on-site at the same time as the bath tiler. Three months later they're still living in the house, the budget has slipped 25%, and nobody can remember what the original timeline was supposed to be.
This isn't phasing — it's drift. Real phasing has a master schedule before the first demolition day, defined trade sequences, defined milestones, and defined exit points. Drift has none of those.
The 1654 N Oakley case study — a real phased project.
The clearest way to explain phasing is to walk through an actual project. The most useful reference from our portfolio is the 1654 N Oakley Ave whole-home renovation in Wicker Park — a $250,000 project, 12 weeks of construction, four major scopes, and a family relocating from Dallas to Chicago who needed to move in on a specific date.
The Constraints
- Move-in deadline. The family had a firm move-in date 14 weeks after contract signing. The construction had to finish in 12 weeks to allow 2 weeks of buffer.
- Out-of-state clients. All design and materials decisions made remotely or during one weekend trip to the Lincoln Park studio.
- Four major scopes. Custom navy kitchen with MSI quartz, luxury master bathroom gut with freestanding tub, two guest bathroom upgrades, custom entertainment built-ins, hardwood refinishing throughout.
- Vacant property. Full vacate from day one (the family was still in Dallas). Lowest-cost phasing model.
The Phasing Schedule
Twelve weeks, four overlapping phases. Each phase started before the previous one ended so trades stacked correctly.
- Weeks 1–3 (Demolition + Rough-In). Full demo of kitchen, master bath, two guest baths. Rough plumbing and electrical for all four scopes happening simultaneously because the house was empty. Hardwood floors protected with rosin paper and plywood.
- Weeks 3–6 (Structure + Drywall). Framing for the entertainment built-ins started while plumbing inspections were still happening upstairs. Drywall installation room-by-room as each space passed inspection.
- Weeks 5–8 (Tile + Cabinetry). Master bath tile work started while drywall was still being finished in the kitchen. Custom cabinets arrived on day 35 (pre-ordered on day one of contract) and installed in the kitchen the same week tile was being grouted in the master bath.
- Weeks 8–11 (Finishes + Refinishing). Countertops templated and installed. Plumbing trim. Electrical trim. The trickiest sequence: hardwood floor refinishing across the whole first level, which required everyone off the floors for 4 days during sand and stain.
- Week 12 (Punch). Final walkthrough, punch list, deep cleaning. Family moved in on schedule.
1654 N Oakley Ave — $250K Whole-Home Renovation, 12 Weeks
A Dallas-to-Chicago relocator with a firm move-in date and four major scopes to complete. We used a full-vacate phasing model with overlapping trade sequences so the house was never idle. The phasing decision saved approximately 4 weeks versus a sequential-rooms model and roughly $30,000 in construction premium.
What made it work: the family was out-of-state during construction (vacant property), the materials were pre-ordered on day one of contract (no schedule blowouts), and the trades had been pre-coordinated by Cliff, our PM, who'd worked with all of them for 3+ years. Read the full 1654 N Oakley case study for materials, finishes, and before/after photography.
The MEP sequencing problem most contractors get wrong.
MEP stands for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing — the three trades whose work has to be coordinated across every room of a whole-home renovation. The single biggest scheduling failure on phased projects is treating MEP as separate room-by-room scopes instead of one integrated trade sequence across the whole home.
Here's what happens when MEP gets treated room-by-room. The electrician comes to rough-in the kitchen in week 2. He leaves. The plumber comes to rough-in the master bath in week 4. The electrician comes back to rough-in the master bath in week 5. The plumber comes back for the guest bath in week 7. The electrician comes back for the guest bath in week 8. By the end of the project, each MEP trade has made four or five visits, each with a minimum charge, and the project has lost two weeks of schedule to scheduling overhead.
The correct sequence is to roughest-in every MEP across the whole home in a single coordinated block. The electrician comes once during the demolition phase, runs all the new wiring everywhere the new design requires it, regardless of which room is being finished first. Same with the plumber. Same with the HVAC contractor if ducts or vents are being moved. One coordinated rough-in, one coordinated inspection, one coordinated set of permits.
This means the family's kitchen sits in rough-in condition for a few extra weeks while the master bath is also rough-in. Which sounds counterintuitive — you'd think it makes the kitchen take longer. But the total project time drops by 2 to 3 weeks because no MEP trade is making more than two visits (rough-in and finish), the inspections all happen in one consolidated pass, and the trades that follow (drywall, tile, cabinetry) can plan around a single rough-in completion date.
Why Most Contractors Skip This
Because it requires master scheduling. It requires the contractor to think about the whole project before any of it starts, to have all the design decisions locked in before MEP rough-in begins, and to have the discipline not to start cosmetic work too early. It's also harder to bill in milestones because you're not finishing one room and moving to the next — you're working on all of them in parallel.
The contractors who don't do this typically aren't lazy. They're working with a design that wasn't fully locked when they started, so they can't run all the MEP at once because some of it hasn't been designed yet. That's the deeper problem: phased renovations require the design to be 100% complete before the first day of demolition. Not 80%. Not 90%. 100%. Every wall, every outlet, every plumbing fixture, every appliance, every light fixture, every cabinet pull. Locked.
Living through construction — what's actually tolerable.
If you're choosing sequential rooms or zone-based phasing, you're going to live in the house during active construction. Here's what's actually tolerable and what isn't, based on what clients tell me at the end of projects.
Tolerable
- One working kitchen (even if it's a temporary kitchen in the basement or laundry room with a microwave, electric kettle, induction burner, and small fridge)
- One full bathroom at all times — never zero
- Working laundry, even if relocated temporarily
- A bedroom that's at least 50 feet from active construction
- HVAC system that still works (this is non-negotiable in Chicago summers and winters)
- Daily cleanup before the crew leaves so the house is presentable overnight
Not Tolerable (and ends the phasing approach)
- Loss of all bathrooms simultaneously
- Loss of HVAC for more than 24 hours during summer or winter
- Active construction within 20 feet of an infant's bedroom
- Dust migration into bedrooms (caused by inadequate containment)
- Pets that can't be safely contained from the work area
- A family member with a respiratory condition that's aggravated by construction dust regardless of containment
If any of the "not tolerable" conditions exist, the phasing model has to change. Either move to full vacate or restructure the sequence so the affected scope happens later (after a hospital stay, after kids leave for camp, after the asthma improves with treatment). Trying to push through "not tolerable" conditions is when client relationships break down on whole-home projects. The contractor isn't doing anything wrong — the family just can't take it anymore.
The hardest conversation I have with phased-renovation clients is usually in week five. They thought they could live through it. They can't. We move them out for the remainder, save the schedule, and a year later they thank me. The relationship survives because we built the option into the contract.
— Viktor Aharon, Assembly SquadThe mid-project vacate decision.
Every whole-home contract we write for a phased project includes a clause we call the "mid-project vacate option." It allows the homeowner to switch from sequential rooms or zone-based to full vacate at any point during construction, on 7 days notice, without breaking the contract. I built this clause into our standard contract three years ago after watching too many families try to power through and end up resentful.
When the option gets exercised:
- The family arranges alternative housing within 7 days (most often a short-term furnished rental in Lincoln Park or River North; sometimes family in the suburbs)
- The contractor takes full access to the home and accelerates the remaining schedule by typically 25 to 35 percent
- The total project finishes 2 to 4 weeks earlier than the phased timeline would have
- The construction cost drops back to the full-vacate baseline for any work remaining (the premium is only charged on work actually performed under occupied conditions)
- The family pays the alternative housing cost out of pocket but recoups some of it in the construction-cost reduction
About 30 percent of our phased projects end up exercising this clause. It's rarely because the contractor did anything wrong. It's because the construction environment turned out to be harder on the family than they expected. The clause exists so that decision is easy to make, not stigmatized.
What To Look For In Your Own Contract
If you're signing with a contractor for a phased whole-home renovation, ask whether their contract includes any of the following:
- A clear definition of which rooms or zones are "active construction" versus "off-limits to the client" at any given time
- A mid-project vacate clause or equivalent flexibility provision
- Defined daily cleanup standards (what level of presentability the home is left in at end of each work day)
- A dust containment plan with specific materials (plastic with zippered doors, hard wall partitions, HEPA negative air machines — not just "we'll be careful")
- Defined work hours and quiet hours, especially if there are infants or remote workers in the home
If none of these provisions appear in the contract, the contractor either hasn't done many phased projects or hasn't done them well. Phasing without these provisions is improvisation, and improvisation on a 12-week, $250K project is how things go wrong.
What goes wrong with phased projects — and how to prevent it.
After 500+ projects I can recite the failure modes from memory. Most are preventable with phasing discipline at the front end of the project. Here are the five most common.
1. The Design Isn't Locked Before Demolition
Demolition starts before every material has been selected, every appliance has been spec'd, every cabinet pull has been chosen. Two weeks in, the homeowner is still picking tile. Tile picks affect plumbing rough-in. Plumbing rough-in affects framing. Framing affects electrical. By the time the design is "locked," half the rough-in work is wrong. Prevention: don't sign the demolition start authorization until every material decision is documented in the contract.
2. Materials Aren't Pre-Ordered
Cabinets, countertops, tile, light fixtures, plumbing fixtures, appliances — everything has a lead time, and lead times in 2026 have not returned to pre-2020 norms. Custom cabinets are 6 to 12 weeks. Imported stone is 4 to 8 weeks. Some high-end appliances are 10 to 16 weeks. Prevention: order everything on day one of contract, store at the contractor's warehouse, deliver to site when needed.
3. The MEP Sequence Gets Treated Room-By-Room
Covered in Section 5. Each electrician visit has a minimum charge. Each plumber visit too. Multiple visits per trade can add 4 to 6 weeks to schedule and tens of thousands to cost. Prevention: one coordinated MEP rough-in for the whole home, one inspection pass.
4. The Family Underestimates The Living Conditions
Covered in Section 7. Most families think they can live through more than they actually can. Prevention: the mid-project vacate clause and an honest conversation about lifestyle, family composition, and stress tolerance during the contract phase, not during construction.
5. No Master Schedule, Just Drift
Covered in Section 3. The most expensive mistake. The renovation starts with one scope and grows to four, with no overall plan. Prevention: a written 14- to 20-week master schedule with phase-by-phase milestones, signed by both parties at the start of the project.
How to evaluate a contractor's phasing discipline.
When you're interviewing contractors for a whole-home renovation, the design discussion will be exciting and the phasing discussion will be boring. Force the phasing discussion anyway. The contractor's answers to phasing questions will tell you more about whether they can deliver your project than anything else they say.
The Six Questions To Ask
1. "Walk me through how you would phase this project."
Listen for: a specific phasing model recommendation, a stated trade sequence, defined milestones, and an honest assessment of which phasing model fits your home. A contractor who answers "we'd do it room by room" without any further structure hasn't done many whole-home projects.
2. "When does the design need to be 100% locked?"
The correct answer is "before demolition starts." A contractor who says "we can make changes as we go" is telling you they don't run disciplined projects.
3. "How do you sequence MEP across the whole home?"
The correct answer involves a single coordinated rough-in pass, not room-by-room. If they don't have a clear answer, they're going to make 4 to 5 electrician visits and bill you for each one.
4. "Can I see a sample phasing schedule from a recent whole-home project?"
A contractor with phasing discipline has these documents and shares them. A contractor without phasing discipline either won't have them or will share something generic.
5. "What's your mid-project flexibility if the construction is harder on my family than expected?"
Looking for: a defined clause or process for switching phasing models mid-project. If the answer is vague ("we'll figure it out") the contractor either hasn't thought about it or isn't being transparent.
6. "How many electrician and plumber visits will my project require?"
A contractor with master scheduling can answer this question precisely. A contractor without will give you a range that's 2x too wide.
Conclusion & next steps.
A whole-home renovation in Chicago is, more than anything else, a phasing exercise. The design decisions get all the attention — the cabinets, the stone, the fixtures, the millwork — but the phasing decisions are what determine whether the project actually finishes on schedule, on budget, and with the family still happy with the contractor at the end of it.
The three phasing models — sequential rooms, zone-based, full vacate — each have a best-fit scenario. Choose the wrong one and you'll pay for it in weeks of extra timeline, tens of thousands in extra cost, or a level of household stress you didn't sign up for. Choose the right one and the project runs the way the 1654 N Oakley project did — on time, on budget, no drama.
If you're planning a $150,000 to $400,000 whole-home renovation in Chicago, Wicker Park, Lincoln Park, Lakeview, the West Loop, or the North Shore, start the phasing conversation before the design conversation. The model you choose will shape every decision that follows. Get it right at the front and the rest of the project becomes easier. Get it wrong and the design barely matters.
To start a conversation about phasing your specific home, your specific family, and your specific timeline:
- Phone: (312) 544-9150
- Lincoln Park Design Studio: 2315 N Southport Ave, Chicago, IL 60614
- Headquarters: 205 N Michigan Ave, Suite 810, Chicago, IL 60601
- Schedule a private consultation: assemblyserviceil.com/contact
The consultation includes a phasing assessment for your specific home, a recommended phasing model with rationale, an estimated cost premium for each model, and a fixed-price proposal that includes the phasing schedule as a contractual deliverable, not an afterthought.
Why Chicago homeowners choose Assembly Squad for whole-home renovations
Common questions about phasing a Chicago whole-home renovation
How much does a whole-home renovation in Chicago cost in 2026?
A whole-home renovation in Chicago typically runs $150,000 to $400,000+ depending on square footage, finish level, and phasing model. Mid-range whole-homes (single-family, 4-6 rooms, mid-tier finishes) range $150K-$250K. Luxury whole-homes (custom millwork, premium stone, designer involvement) range $250K-$400K. Pre-war condo whole-home gut renovations on Lake Shore Drive can exceed $400K. The phasing model adds 0% (full vacate baseline), 5-8% (zone-based), or 10-15% (sequential rooms) on top of the base scope.
What are the three phasing models for a Chicago whole-home renovation?
The three phasing models are sequential rooms (family stays, rooms renovated one or two at a time, 10-15% premium), zone-based (home divided into private zone and construction zone with hard partitions, 5-8% premium), and full vacate (family moves out, lowest cost and fastest timeline). Sequential rooms fits single-family homes with at least three bedrooms and two bathrooms. Zone-based works in condos with clean spatial division. Full vacate is required for pre-war buildings, gut work covering 60%+ of the home, or any family with infants, allergies, or pets that can't tolerate construction.
How long does a whole-home renovation take in Chicago?
Active construction typically runs 12 to 20 weeks for a whole-home renovation, depending on scope and phasing. A full-vacate project at $250K with 4 major scopes (kitchen, master bath, two guest baths, hardwood) finishes in 12 weeks — this is the timeline we delivered on the 1654 N Oakley Wicker Park project. Sequential-rooms phasing adds 2-4 weeks. Zone-based adds 1-2 weeks. Add 6-8 weeks of pre-construction (design lock, permit, materials pre-order) to get total project timeline of 18 to 28 weeks from contract signing to move-in.
Can my family live in the house during a whole-home renovation?
Yes, with sequential-rooms or zone-based phasing — but with conditions. You need at least one functioning bathroom at all times, a working temporary kitchen, a working HVAC system, and a bedroom at least 50 feet from active construction. Families with infants, family members with respiratory conditions, or pets that can't be safely contained should plan for full vacate. Even families who plan to live through it should have the contract include a mid-project vacate clause — about 30% of our phased projects end up exercising that option mid-construction.
What is the mid-project vacate clause?
The mid-project vacate clause is a contract provision that allows homeowners to switch from sequential-rooms or zone-based phasing to full vacate at any point during construction on 7 days notice without breaking the contract. When exercised, the contractor accelerates the remaining schedule by 25-35%, total project time drops by 2-4 weeks, and construction cost drops back to the full-vacate baseline for remaining work. About 30% of our phased projects use this clause — usually around week 5 when families realize the construction environment is harder on them than they expected.
What is MEP sequencing and why does it matter?
MEP stands for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing. MEP sequencing is the discipline of running all the rough-in work for these three trades in one coordinated pass across the whole home, rather than treating each room separately. The wrong approach (room-by-room MEP) causes each trade to make 4-5 visits with minimum charges per visit, adds 4-6 weeks of schedule, and adds tens of thousands to project cost. The correct approach (single coordinated rough-in) means each trade visits twice — once for rough-in, once for finish — and inspections happen in a single consolidated pass.
Why does the design need to be 100% locked before demolition?
Because every material decision affects rough-in work that has to happen before finishes go on. Tile choice affects plumbing rough-in locations. Cabinet specification affects electrical outlet placement. Appliance dimensions affect framing. Fixture finish affects valve rough-in. If demolition starts before these decisions are locked, the rough-in work has to be redone when decisions get made later — which can add 3-6 weeks and 15-25% to project cost. Disciplined contractors won't authorize demolition start until every material is documented in the contract.
What's the difference between "phasing" and "drift" on a whole-home renovation?
Phasing has a master schedule before the first day of demolition, defined trade sequences, defined milestones, and defined exit points. Drift is what happens when a family "just starts with the kitchen" without a master plan for the rest of the home — they add scopes mid-project, contractors stack onto the site without coordination, and the budget slips 20-30% from where it should have been. Drift is the single most expensive failure mode on whole-home projects. Real phasing prevents it.
How much should I budget for alternative housing if I full-vacate?
In 2026, a furnished two-bedroom rental in Lincoln Park, River North, or the West Loop runs $5,000 to $8,000 per month. For a typical 12-week whole-home renovation, that's $15,000 to $24,000 in alternative housing. Many full-vacate clients stay with family or use a second residence to avoid this cost. The construction cost savings from full vacate (10-15% versus sequential rooms) often covers most or all of the alternative housing budget — the net cost difference between staying and vacating is usually smaller than people expect.
How do I evaluate a contractor's phasing discipline before signing?
Ask six questions: (1) How would you phase this project? (2) When does the design need to be 100% locked? (3) How do you sequence MEP across the whole home? (4) Can I see a sample phasing schedule from a recent project? (5) What's your mid-project flexibility if construction is harder on my family than expected? (6) How many electrician and plumber visits will my project require? A contractor with phasing discipline answers all six questions specifically and has documents to back up the answers. A contractor without discipline gives vague answers and has nothing to show.
Planning a Chicago whole-home renovation?
Private consultation at your home, our Lincoln Park design studio, or via virtual session. Phasing assessment, recommended model with rationale, and fixed-price proposals that include the phasing schedule as a contractual deliverable. 500+ completed projects across Chicago and the North Shore.
Book a Private Consultation 312-544-9150